SMU – PHIL 3379 – ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS – FALL 2023 – JEAN KAZEZ – eesmu.blogspot.com

Friday, October 20, 2023

MODULE 3: Geoengineering debate

SLIDE SHOW

NEW WAY TO PICK WINNER

  1. Before debate: write down where you are on spectrum  below
  2. After debate: write down where you are on spectrum below
  3. Did you move toward A or toward B?
NEW WAY TO DISCUSS AFTER DEBATE
  1. Write down ONE question for ONE team member--Kayla, Finn, Chris, George, Ben
  2. They'll read your questions and decide what to answer




GEOENGINEERING--MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION?

Mitigation--stop climate change -- "kill the wolf"
Adaptation--get used to climate change -- "build a brick house"



Two ways to mitigate/"kill the wolf"
Reduce greenhouse gases--burn fossil fuels less--transition to wind, solar, etc. 
Prevent greenhouse gases from causing climate change
  1. High tech geoengineering--Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), Solar Radiation Management (SRM)
  2. Natural geoengineering)--plant trees




DEBATE DISCUSSION


MY QUESTIONS
  1. For Kaley (intro)--Remind us why planting trees is a type of geoengineering!  It seems very different.
  2. For Finn and Ben (A) --Which of the two claims below were you making?
    • BACK-UP:  should work very hard on GHG reduction and research high-tech geoengineering as a back up in case it doesn't work (Paris agreement view)
    • RELAX: we should relax reduction efforts quite a bit, and research high-tech geoengineering, which will be easier, cheaper, faster (Lomborg's view)
  3. For Chris (B) --Do you object to geoengineering because the specific proposals seem hopeless or also because there's something bad about the very idea?
  4. For George and Ben (B, A)--You both discuss whether geoengineering will just have regional benefits, which would be problematic.  Won't most forms have global benefits -- just as greenhouse emissions cause global temperature rise?

CLASSMATE QUESIONS
  1. For Kaley (intro): How temporary of a fix are the four methods you covered? Days, months, years?
  2. For Finn (A): What is the most negative impact of geoengineering?
  3. For Ben (A): What would you suggest to mitigate potential negative side effects of geoengineering?
  4. For Chris (B): How long until geoengineering ruins the environment, if it continues at its current rate?
  5. For George (B): What do you think is the main problem, on a global scale, for geoengineering?  Is it the cost, lack of testing...?
  6. Anyone: is there a middle ground between no and full investment in geoengeinering that would be effective on climate change?
  7. Anyone: How much area would the sulfur cover in the air regarding the sulfate aerosol cloud seeding?
  8. Anyone: What happens to the carbon in phytoplankton after the 100+ years