AGENDA
- Kevin DeLuca, "A Wilderness Manifesto"
 - Reports
 - Review for midterm
 
- A polemic against the environmental justice movement
 - Kevin DeLuca, professor of communication, University of Utah
 - Written in 2007, so some info out of date
 - He mentions William Cronon--we will read him in the wilderness module
 
Two types of environmentalism
DeLuca's claims (more detail)
| "Environmental justice movement" or EJM--focused on "our environment" in the sense of the conditions we live in  | 
| "Green environmentalism"--focused on "the environment" in the sense of nature, ecosystems, wilderness, wildlife  | 
- EJM and GE have different goals
 - EJM: fairness to specific groups
 - GE: preserving nature
 - Their goals are often in conflict
 - EJM: indigenous rights to hunt polar bears
 - GE: protecting polar bears
 - Another example (EJM on the side of indigenous Masai, GE on the side of African wildlife)
 - EJM is taking over environmental organizations (reporters will assess)
 - EJM and GE differ on solutions
 - EJM wants to empower local groups--for justice reasons
 - GE prefers the most effective solution, often national
 - EJM has been very successful at gaining governmental support
 - Example: Biden's Climate Initiative & Justice 40 (see Bullard in the picture below)
 - We will discuss next week
 - Bottom line
 - Environmentalists should be green environmentalists
 - EJM should thrive, too, but as a human justice movement
 
_________________________
Review for midterm

No comments:
Post a Comment
SIGN with your first name.