AGENDA
- Peter Singer recap
- Climate Tracker assessment of NDCs under Paris Agreement
- Preview: Bjorn Lomborg
_________________________
What should different nations do to prevent further climate change? What is each nation's "fair share" of the effort needed to keep temperature rise below 1.5 or 2 deg C?
(1) Historical principle: present reductions should be proportional to past emissions.
(2) Time slice approaches: Equal shares
Problem: unequal per capita emissions
Solution: equal shares
- forget the past
- each person has a right to the same emissions
- this allowance should be consistent with keeping temperature rise below 2 deg C.
- the allowance might be 2 tons CO2 per person
- each country's fair share of emissions = 2.3 tons X country's population
- Each country's fair share of effort to reduce based on their "overage" or "underage"
Historical vs. equal share
- Time-slice and historical: US has to do a lot
- Time-slice: China has to do just as much as US
- Historical: China has to do less than US
_________________________
(3) Time-slice: roughly equal shares
- subsistence emissions -- methane from rice paddies, heating fuel in Greenland
- development emissions -- costs of rising from poverty
- luxury emissions -- costs of big car, freezing cold movie theaters, flying to Europe
_________________________
How to make the reductions occur
Assume "equal shares" for simplicity
Garret Hardin--"mutual coercion mutually agreed upon"
Cap and trade
- Every nation issued is permits based on population
- Must have permits to emit GHG
- "Overage" countries will have to buy permits from "underage" countries
- Overage countries will have motivation to mitigate (so they don't have to buy so many permits)
- Underage countries will have motivation to stay low but have money to develop
- Cap and trade is a reality within countries/regions: European Union Emissions Trading System ; also California, China, etc.
Climate Tracker assessment of country NDCs under Paris Agreement
Climate tracker: what does fair share mean?
Responsibility: historical
Equality: equal shares
Capabilities
Cost-effectiveness