SMU – PHIL 3379 – ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS – FALL 2023 – JEAN KAZEZ – eesmu.blogspot.com

Monday, October 16, 2023

MODULE 3: Distributing the burden

 AGENDA

  1. Fair share--what does it mean?
  2. Which countries are doing their fair share? (Climate Tracker)


OUR QUESTION
  • It will take huge GHG reductions to keep global temp rise under 1.5 C
  • What is each country's fair share of the effort? 
Peter Singer--the village drain that's filling up
What is each villager's fair share of the remaining space?




FOUR FAIRNESS FRAMEWORKS
  1. historical
  2. time-slice/equality
  3. capabilities (not in Singer)
  4. cost-effectiveness (not in Singer)






HISTORICAL PRINCIPLES
OUR WORLD IN DATA
  • Biggest past polluters should make biggest reductions in GHG going forward
  • Details:
    • #1--polluter pays for past pollution, unadjusted
    • #2--polluter pays, basic emissions ignored
    • #3--polluter pays, focus on consumption not production
    • #4--polluter pays, focus on period when we knew
    • #5--polluter pays, ignore emissions with high global benefits






TIME SLICE PRINCIPLES/EQUALITY
  • the important time-slice is the present
  • ethical assumption: each person has a right to the same emissions (equality)
  • question: what per capita GHG emissions will keep temp rise below 1.5C in 2100?  
  • Answer: about 2.3 tons CO2 equivalent
  • fair share for each country: population X 2.3 tons

  • Details:
    • Possible mechanism: cap and trade
    • Countries receive emission allowances
    • Countries under 2.3 tons per capita will have unused permits
    • High emission countries buy them, incentivizing further reductions
    • European Union carbon market
  • Population question
    • Singer: should allowance increase as population grows?
    • Could tie allowance to current population



CAPABILITES
  • Countries at war
  • Countries dealing with natural disasters, famines, etc.
  • Underdeveloped countries
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • Cost per ton reduced
  • Cloudy Country vs. Sunny Country




USING THE FOUR CRITERIA TO ASSESS COUNTRIES



INDIVIDUAL EFFORTS
  • Can individuals make up for government inaction?
  • Can we make a difference?
  • We will discuss more in module 5



NEXT--

Bjorn Lomborg--readings for next time
  1. Mitigation is very difficult and expensive
  2. Should focus more on...
    • adaptation
    • other world problems
    • geoengineering (debate on Friday)